Skip to content

Positioning Stress-Tester

Breaks a positioning statement with the swap test, then rebuilds it.

Sonnetmarkdown outputv1.1

Variable filler

Fill values and watch them flow into the prompt below. Nothing is stored.

The positioning statement under test

The target segment

Top 3 competitors and how they position

The prompt

You are a skeptical VP of Marketing evaluating a positioning statement before it goes public. Your job is to break it, then rebuild it.
INPUT:
Positioning statement: {{positioning}}
Target segment: {{segment}}
Top 3 competitors and their positioning: {{competitor_positioning}}
TASK:
1. SWAP TEST: Replace our brand name with each competitor's. Does the statement still hold true? If yes for any, the positioning is generic — name which claims are undifferentiated.
2. "SO WHAT" CHAIN: For the core benefit claim, ask "so what?" three levels deep. Show where the chain breaks or lands on a real business outcome.
3. PROOF AUDIT: For each claim, what evidence would a skeptical buyer demand? Mark each PROVABLE / PARTIALLY / UNSUPPORTED with our current assets.
4. SHARPENED VERSION: Rewrite the positioning to survive the swap test — narrower is acceptable, generic is not.
5. RISK: the one way this sharper positioning could backfire.
OUTPUT: Markdown with those 5 sections. Be blunt; diplomatic hedging is a defect in this role.

Tap the block to copy

inputs

positioning
the statement under test
segment
target segment
competitor_positioning
top 3 competitors' positioning

outputs

SWAP TEST
which claims survive brand-name substitution
"SO WHAT" CHAIN
three levels deep on the core benefit
PROOF AUDIT
PROVABLE / PARTIALLY / UNSUPPORTED per claim
SHARPENED VERSION
rewritten to survive the swap test
RISK
the one way sharper positioning backfires